I HAD LASIK SURGERY DONE ON BOTH EYES FOR DISTANCE CORRECTION ON 1/10/03. MY DOCTOR ONLY ADVISED ME AFTER THE PROCEDURE THAT HE UNDERCORRECTED ME BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF MY PUPILS. I DON'T KNOW WHY HE DIDN'T ADVISE ME PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. ALTHOUGH I CAN SEE ALOT BETTER UP CLOSE AND AM ABLE TO READ, AND WORK ON THE COMPUTER WITH NO PROBLEMS, OTHER THAN SOME DRYNESS, MY DISTANCE VISION IS STILL VERY BLURY, WORSE AT NIGHT AND I WAS GIVEN GLASSES UNTIL I AM STABLE ENOUGH TO CONSIDER AN ENHANCEMENT, BECAUSE I CAN'T DRIVE OR PERFORM MY DAILY ACTIVITES WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO SEE CLEARLY. MY DR TOLD ME I HAD REGRESSED TO -1.5. I PICKED UP THE GLASSES YESTERDAY AND WORE THEM TODAY AT WORK AND I STILL CAN'T SEE CLEARLY WITH THEM. I AM FRUSTRATED. I JUST WANT TO SEE CLEARLY EVEN IF I HAVE TO WEAR GLASSES FOR A WHILE. WHAT DETERMINES THE DOCTOR TO UNDERCORRECT A PATIENT? AND WHY DOES THE DR NOT KNOW WHAT THE OUTCOME WILL BE BEFORE THE SURGERY? WHY CAN'T THE PROCEDURE BE DONE RIGHT THE 1ST TIME? HOW LONG WILL I BE BLURY? THANKS FOR LISTENING TO ME.

SUSAN