 |
|
 |
 |
Table of Contents
.....................................................................................................................
Stable refraction, Lynn - BR, NJ, 4/26/2006
.....................................................................................................................
|
"Stable refraction" Posted by Lynn - BR, NJ on 11:26:58 4/26/2006
|
Include Original
Message on Reply |
I am asking this question as it pertains to my 21 year old son: At age 17-18, his manifest refraction and cyclopegic refraction were
-9.25 after a period of 3 days without the contact lenses. Up until this time (2002), he had been wearing soft contact lenses for approx. 6 years (all day, not at night.)From 2002 - present date his prescription for glasses and contacts have not changed. He recently went for a pre-op exam (for Lasek) after his lenses were removed for 2 1/2 weeks and his refraction was declared to be -8.5. He was told that his eyes were not stable enough to have the procedure done. He has sufficient cornea, and I do not know of any other disqualifier. It appears to me that the delta diopters from the time he was 17/18 years old until now(21 years old) is more a reflection of the length of time the lenses were removed than a reflection of change (regression??) of the myopia. Any insight would be helpful. His career options rely heavily on his obtaining refractive correction. Any reference to scholarly articles supporting my view would certainly be appreciated.
|
 |
If you encounter any problems with the bulletin board, please notify the
|
|
 |
|